<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Textpattern vs WordPress &#8211; a Lack of Momentum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.olivernielsen.com/2008/11/02/textpattern-vs-wordpress-a-lack-of-momentum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.olivernielsen.com/2008/11/02/textpattern-vs-wordpress-a-lack-of-momentum/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:36:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gerold</title>
		<link>http://www.olivernielsen.com/2008/11/02/textpattern-vs-wordpress-a-lack-of-momentum/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.olivernielsen.com/?p=346#comment-379</guid>
		<description>A fine start posting with an illustrative discussion. And a funny one to read, with Messiah, bin Laden and the new Carlsberg receipe in it. 

There is good reason to go with txp. The momentum at WP to me looks more like breathlessness. Always bigger, better, faster - for what reason?

Is spam a problem for textpatternistas? No, it is not.

There is not every Application possible in txp. Well, Robert gave the right answer in his comment (1):  .. I suspect there’s nothing which would discourage anyone from building one if she sees a business case in it ..  

Conclusion: If you are calm, if you wan&#039;t a small, fast and stable CMS - give txp and its calm community a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fine start posting with an illustrative discussion. And a funny one to read, with Messiah, bin Laden and the new Carlsberg receipe in it. </p>
<p>There is good reason to go with txp. The momentum at WP to me looks more like breathlessness. Always bigger, better, faster &#8211; for what reason?</p>
<p>Is spam a problem for textpatternistas? No, it is not.</p>
<p>There is not every Application possible in txp. Well, Robert gave the right answer in his comment (1):  .. I suspect there’s nothing which would discourage anyone from building one if she sees a business case in it ..  </p>
<p>Conclusion: If you are calm, if you wan&#8217;t a small, fast and stable CMS &#8211; give txp and its calm community a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.olivernielsen.com/2008/11/02/textpattern-vs-wordpress-a-lack-of-momentum/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.olivernielsen.com/?p=346#comment-377</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve stuck with WordPress since I wrote the blog post. Been very happy doing so.

Recently I tried Textpattern on a small project, just for the sake of research and nostalgia. It was okay, but the WordPress ecosystem is far superior. Whatever your problem in WordPress, just Google it, and there you are. Home free. With Textpattern, everything is so scattered. Plugins, plugin support, info on a plugins compatibility, is it still maintained: Frustrating.

So, one of my new year resolutions for 2010, is to ONLY use WordPress. Not windowshop for alternatives like TXP, EE, Drupal, Joomla, FireRift or whatever.

WordPress is amazing!

Have a good 2010!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve stuck with WordPress since I wrote the blog post. Been very happy doing so.</p>
<p>Recently I tried Textpattern on a small project, just for the sake of research and nostalgia. It was okay, but the WordPress ecosystem is far superior. Whatever your problem in WordPress, just Google it, and there you are. Home free. With Textpattern, everything is so scattered. Plugins, plugin support, info on a plugins compatibility, is it still maintained: Frustrating.</p>
<p>So, one of my new year resolutions for 2010, is to ONLY use WordPress. Not windowshop for alternatives like TXP, EE, Drupal, Joomla, FireRift or whatever.</p>
<p>WordPress is amazing!</p>
<p>Have a good 2010!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.olivernielsen.com/2008/11/02/textpattern-vs-wordpress-a-lack-of-momentum/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.olivernielsen.com/?p=346#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Good Article. Pleasant to read AND informative. Uncommon for this day and age. Think i might stick w/ WordPress though. Drupal is awesome, but far too complicated for my needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Article. Pleasant to read AND informative. Uncommon for this day and age. Think i might stick w/ WordPress though. Drupal is awesome, but far too complicated for my needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.olivernielsen.com/2008/11/02/textpattern-vs-wordpress-a-lack-of-momentum/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.olivernielsen.com/?p=346#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Nah, you&#039;re not late, only good to hear from you Duncan!

My comments on Dean Allen is not at all targeted at his potential for fame, but rather his potentials as a leader. Steve Jobs made Apple what it is today. I see Dean Allen more like Steve Wozniak - without Woz, Apple would probably not have been conceived, and without Dean, Textpattern wouldn&#039;t either. But to bring it forward, a visionary *leader* is needed. Like Matt Mullenweg of WordPress.

Dean Allen&#039;s background as a book cover designer and typographer, instead of &quot;mere programmer&quot; made Textpattern unique and wonderful: An interface that is different than most other content management systems, because it works the way I, as a non-programmer wants it to: Forms, easy-on-the-eyes template tags, clean XHTML output, textile, etc.

But a leader he was/is not. I don&#039;t care about his fame. But to take any project further it needs a leader, who can... lead the project in the right direction. So that followers (ie. developers and users) knows where to go, so to say. With him, it was always more a play of incognito silence, abrubt announcements, more silence, and then he left Textpattern.

Then in came Mary and Zem... and thankfully they left again...

Indexhibit is cool! I like simple tools as well. It&#039;s all about accomplishing what one wants to achieve, in the fastest, most efficient way possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, you&#8217;re not late, only good to hear from you Duncan!</p>
<p>My comments on Dean Allen is not at all targeted at his potential for fame, but rather his potentials as a leader. Steve Jobs made Apple what it is today. I see Dean Allen more like Steve Wozniak &#8211; without Woz, Apple would probably not have been conceived, and without Dean, Textpattern wouldn&#8217;t either. But to bring it forward, a visionary *leader* is needed. Like Matt Mullenweg of WordPress.</p>
<p>Dean Allen&#8217;s background as a book cover designer and typographer, instead of &#8220;mere programmer&#8221; made Textpattern unique and wonderful: An interface that is different than most other content management systems, because it works the way I, as a non-programmer wants it to: Forms, easy-on-the-eyes template tags, clean XHTML output, textile, etc.</p>
<p>But a leader he was/is not. I don&#8217;t care about his fame. But to take any project further it needs a leader, who can&#8230; lead the project in the right direction. So that followers (ie. developers and users) knows where to go, so to say. With him, it was always more a play of incognito silence, abrubt announcements, more silence, and then he left Textpattern.</p>
<p>Then in came Mary and Zem&#8230; and thankfully they left again&#8230;</p>
<p>Indexhibit is cool! I like simple tools as well. It&#8217;s all about accomplishing what one wants to achieve, in the fastest, most efficient way possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMC</title>
		<link>http://www.olivernielsen.com/2008/11/02/textpattern-vs-wordpress-a-lack-of-momentum/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>DMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.olivernielsen.com/?p=346#comment-294</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit late in a the game here, I know.

I have to agree and disagree, annoying I know, but here goes.
I disagree that Textpattern is going stale, or that it&#039;ll end up in the tech graveyard, because there are always clients who simply don&#039;t care about the tech stuff. They want a website with their info on it, they want to be able to edit that info. That&#039;s it. In some cases they even prefer (wait for it) Indexhibit, because of it&#039;s simplicity and lack of features. Crazy talk I hear you say. 

For the tech obsessed, sure, Textpattern isn&#039;t going to be enough, and you&#039;re right, it currently isn&#039;t keeping up with the pack, but that&#039;s not a reason to write it off. It does a job and does it well. Like Voltaire supposedly said, better is the enemy of good.

With regards to the whole Dean Allen &quot;he&#039;s not a leader&quot;, &quot;he won&#039;t get famous&quot; thing, well, I really, REALLy don&#039;t think it;s important. At all.

So yeah, agree and disagree. Good article though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit late in a the game here, I know.</p>
<p>I have to agree and disagree, annoying I know, but here goes.<br />
I disagree that Textpattern is going stale, or that it&#8217;ll end up in the tech graveyard, because there are always clients who simply don&#8217;t care about the tech stuff. They want a website with their info on it, they want to be able to edit that info. That&#8217;s it. In some cases they even prefer (wait for it) Indexhibit, because of it&#8217;s simplicity and lack of features. Crazy talk I hear you say. </p>
<p>For the tech obsessed, sure, Textpattern isn&#8217;t going to be enough, and you&#8217;re right, it currently isn&#8217;t keeping up with the pack, but that&#8217;s not a reason to write it off. It does a job and does it well. Like Voltaire supposedly said, better is the enemy of good.</p>
<p>With regards to the whole Dean Allen &#8220;he&#8217;s not a leader&#8221;, &#8220;he won&#8217;t get famous&#8221; thing, well, I really, REALLy don&#8217;t think it;s important. At all.</p>
<p>So yeah, agree and disagree. Good article though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrey Smagin</title>
		<link>http://www.olivernielsen.com/2008/11/02/textpattern-vs-wordpress-a-lack-of-momentum/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrey Smagin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.olivernielsen.com/?p=346#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Thanks Oliver. Actually I already have some experience with Drupal. I&#039;d say it has some disadvantages compared to WordPress. The main one is that it takes some time to wrap your mind around it. It is somewhat of a big piece to swallow at once.  But once you get it, and get comfortable with CCK, you are pretty much unstoppable. Wordpress starts easy on you, and then you can extend it with plugins depending on your needs. That&#039;s the reason behind it&#039;s momentum. Drupal scares some people away. But I totally agree with you - it is much better to start with Acquia - http://acquia.com/downloads 
I will get back to working on my site. Now my imagination running wild and my hands are itching to make something new and nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Oliver. Actually I already have some experience with Drupal. I&#8217;d say it has some disadvantages compared to WordPress. The main one is that it takes some time to wrap your mind around it. It is somewhat of a big piece to swallow at once.  But once you get it, and get comfortable with CCK, you are pretty much unstoppable. Wordpress starts easy on you, and then you can extend it with plugins depending on your needs. That&#8217;s the reason behind it&#8217;s momentum. Drupal scares some people away. But I totally agree with you &#8211; it is much better to start with Acquia &#8211; <a href="http://acquia.com/downloads" rel="nofollow">http://acquia.com/downloads</a><br />
I will get back to working on my site. Now my imagination running wild and my hands are itching to make something new and nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.olivernielsen.com/2008/11/02/textpattern-vs-wordpress-a-lack-of-momentum/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.olivernielsen.com/?p=346#comment-268</guid>
		<description>The social revolution of the web, with communities, which transformed into social networks, and things like Twitter and a multitude of aggregators and mashups, requires a CMS that is flexible (which TXP is) but also has the ability to let users log in on the front-end, and participate in various ways. Textpattern is stuck in the realm of &quot;We Publish - You Read&quot; one-way communication (apart from comments) because it can&#039;t do anything else.

That said, for a magazine style site, it can be a good choice, but so can WordPress and Drupal.

Drupal can do anything. Literally. WordPress can do amazingly much because of its momentum (plugins, great documentation, and tutorials around the web) and theme hackability. And it has something Drupal doesn&#039;t - easy hierarchical pages. For a company website that is nice. If one want&#039;s to do flat, tagged &quot;non-hierarchical&quot; that&#039;s easily done with posts. Power via simplicity. Nice!

Textpattern has one section, and two categories. You can only go two levels deep, which is a limitation.

Having used Drupal myself for a few projects, I think it will make you happy. Especially if you know a little PHP, since the templates requires you to know some.

I would recommend you install Acquia Drupal edition, since it comes with all the essential must have modules of Drupal, including image handling modules, CCK for custom content types, etc. Then you can activate those you need and leave the rest alone. There&#039;s also a package that sets up a local server on your computer, so Drupal runs locally. Drupal is very easy to move from local install to online afterwards.

http://acquia.com/downloads

Now such goodness is not something one would see with Textpattern, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The social revolution of the web, with communities, which transformed into social networks, and things like Twitter and a multitude of aggregators and mashups, requires a CMS that is flexible (which TXP is) but also has the ability to let users log in on the front-end, and participate in various ways. Textpattern is stuck in the realm of &#8220;We Publish &#8211; You Read&#8221; one-way communication (apart from comments) because it can&#8217;t do anything else.</p>
<p>That said, for a magazine style site, it can be a good choice, but so can WordPress and Drupal.</p>
<p>Drupal can do anything. Literally. WordPress can do amazingly much because of its momentum (plugins, great documentation, and tutorials around the web) and theme hackability. And it has something Drupal doesn&#8217;t &#8211; easy hierarchical pages. For a company website that is nice. If one want&#8217;s to do flat, tagged &#8220;non-hierarchical&#8221; that&#8217;s easily done with posts. Power via simplicity. Nice!</p>
<p>Textpattern has one section, and two categories. You can only go two levels deep, which is a limitation.</p>
<p>Having used Drupal myself for a few projects, I think it will make you happy. Especially if you know a little PHP, since the templates requires you to know some.</p>
<p>I would recommend you install Acquia Drupal edition, since it comes with all the essential must have modules of Drupal, including image handling modules, CCK for custom content types, etc. Then you can activate those you need and leave the rest alone. There&#8217;s also a package that sets up a local server on your computer, so Drupal runs locally. Drupal is very easy to move from local install to online afterwards.</p>
<p><a href="http://acquia.com/downloads" rel="nofollow">http://acquia.com/downloads</a></p>
<p>Now such goodness is not something one would see with Textpattern, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrey Smagin</title>
		<link>http://www.olivernielsen.com/2008/11/02/textpattern-vs-wordpress-a-lack-of-momentum/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrey Smagin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 05:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.olivernielsen.com/?p=346#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nice coverage of this whole situation with textpattern. I&#039;m on a verge of updating my site, that I haven&#039;t touched for couple years. And was thinking if I should stay loyal to textpattern or switch to something different. And here I just got confirmation to my doubts about textpattern. I do remember when it was hot and had momentum. But those days are long gone. I&#039;m not the guy who would switch to the newest and hottest CMS over there. But web is growing and there is so much going on. Textpattern is the same as it was 5 years ago. And it&#039;s not the worst part. The scary part that it will be the same next 5 years. I think I will look more into Drupal. Wordpress is cool, but it&#039;s changing too fast to my taste and it has too much noise around it with all the plugins and themes. I think drupal is more solid foundation and more of a true CMS than Wordpress, at the same time it is very easy to extend and customize. Thanks again for advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice coverage of this whole situation with textpattern. I&#8217;m on a verge of updating my site, that I haven&#8217;t touched for couple years. And was thinking if I should stay loyal to textpattern or switch to something different. And here I just got confirmation to my doubts about textpattern. I do remember when it was hot and had momentum. But those days are long gone. I&#8217;m not the guy who would switch to the newest and hottest CMS over there. But web is growing and there is so much going on. Textpattern is the same as it was 5 years ago. And it&#8217;s not the worst part. The scary part that it will be the same next 5 years. I think I will look more into Drupal. Wordpress is cool, but it&#8217;s changing too fast to my taste and it has too much noise around it with all the plugins and themes. I think drupal is more solid foundation and more of a true CMS than Wordpress, at the same time it is very easy to extend and customize. Thanks again for advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.olivernielsen.com/2008/11/02/textpattern-vs-wordpress-a-lack-of-momentum/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.olivernielsen.com/?p=346#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Hi Brandon!

I totally agree that Textpattern rules over WordPress is some areas. Currently I&#039;m at work optimizing my WP installs, since I find saving posts, and page load in general rather slow. It might be due to bloat.

So when I update some of my clients sites, that were built on Textpattern, I am truly amazed at how fast they run. Boom, saved. Boom page loaded. I also totally clicked with TXP template tags instead of ugly PHP.

Which is why it makes me somehow sad to see how Textpattern is slowly but surely fading into the horizon. Development is rather stale.

If Crockery (4.1) comes out, with a brand new, more efficient interface, and a lot of the modern, need-to-have stuff implemented, like tags, multiple categories, etc, yes, then Textpattern might return with a vengeance, but with the downward momentum, it will end like the Commodore Amiga and Betamax video tapes - on the tech graveyard. Period. Even though it was superior in some aspects.

The reason? Lack of momentum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brandon!</p>
<p>I totally agree that Textpattern rules over WordPress is some areas. Currently I&#8217;m at work optimizing my WP installs, since I find saving posts, and page load in general rather slow. It might be due to bloat.</p>
<p>So when I update some of my clients sites, that were built on Textpattern, I am truly amazed at how fast they run. Boom, saved. Boom page loaded. I also totally clicked with TXP template tags instead of ugly PHP.</p>
<p>Which is why it makes me somehow sad to see how Textpattern is slowly but surely fading into the horizon. Development is rather stale.</p>
<p>If Crockery (4.1) comes out, with a brand new, more efficient interface, and a lot of the modern, need-to-have stuff implemented, like tags, multiple categories, etc, yes, then Textpattern might return with a vengeance, but with the downward momentum, it will end like the Commodore Amiga and Betamax video tapes &#8211; on the tech graveyard. Period. Even though it was superior in some aspects.</p>
<p>The reason? Lack of momentum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Erik Bertelsen</title>
		<link>http://www.olivernielsen.com/2008/11/02/textpattern-vs-wordpress-a-lack-of-momentum/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Erik Bertelsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.olivernielsen.com/?p=346#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Cucumbers and porn stars aside, all of the things that people have wanted throughout the years have been added, and if they weren&#039;t someone usually provided a plug. Sure there&#039;s still a few things missing but a project like this (wp and other open source cms included) is always going to be a work in progress. Regardless of the degree of momentum - it is still moving forward and therefore never truely finished.

As a txp -&gt; wp -&gt; txp again kind of guy. I do agree with you that the dev end of txp seems to lack momentum - but what it lacks in momentum is not what it lacks in quality. For personal use, I prefer wp, but when you&#039;re actually trying to do something that isn&#039;t just a run of the mill blog - txp takes a leap and bound past wp.   

Moral of the story, txp still has a way to go - but the potential it has makes me want to wait and see ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cucumbers and porn stars aside, all of the things that people have wanted throughout the years have been added, and if they weren&#8217;t someone usually provided a plug. Sure there&#8217;s still a few things missing but a project like this (wp and other open source cms included) is always going to be a work in progress. Regardless of the degree of momentum &#8211; it is still moving forward and therefore never truely finished.</p>
<p>As a txp -&gt; wp -&gt; txp again kind of guy. I do agree with you that the dev end of txp seems to lack momentum &#8211; but what it lacks in momentum is not what it lacks in quality. For personal use, I prefer wp, but when you&#8217;re actually trying to do something that isn&#8217;t just a run of the mill blog &#8211; txp takes a leap and bound past wp.   </p>
<p>Moral of the story, txp still has a way to go &#8211; but the potential it has makes me want to wait and see <img src='http://www.olivernielsen.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
